Yesterday my husband, son, and I set out in the car to meet up with my brother-in-law, his fiancé, and the kids for the day. We had a good thirty minute car ride, and had I recorded our conversations, I'm curious what others would think. The topics got more intense from one to the next...
Our first exchange was a debate- them against me. I had made a statement about an idea I had in the shower that morning, and I wanted to jot it in my notebook. When I initially spoke the sentence, I realized it wasn't grammatically correct. However I stated it, it sounded like I was going to be writing in the shower. I giggled and corrected the statement aloud. Then, somehow I started talking about how I could be writing in the shower- in my head. One of the smart asses, can't remember which one, says, "Then it wouldn't be writing. It would be thinking." This sparked a healthy debate about whether a writer is actually writing, if they are not engaged in the act of putting the words on paper. We went through various verbs and scenarios such as a writer who uses a keyboard- "No," they said. "Then it's typing." I insisted they were wrong. A writer is anyone who creates a piece of writing, no matter how they engage in the task. They disagreed.
I asked them then, "How do you distinguish between the physical act of writing words with the act of creating a piece of writing?" They didn't seem to think there needed to be a distinction. We bounced around the words publish and create when I asked them how you would refer collectively to all kinds of people who write on keyboard, with a pen, spoken word poetry, etc. All of this had us in stitches, while they tried to trip me up as I danced around explanations of why I disagreed with them. "Obviously," I said, "You are not writing people." And we laughed some more. All we could agree on was that all of these people were creators. My son tried to argue they were publishers as well, but I disagreed arguing if the creation never makes it out of a person's mind, it's not published. They both insisted in that case, no writing had been done either. We laughed all the way into the next topic of conversation.
Graphic of Dyson Sphere- Credit: SentientDevelopments.com |
If you are easily offended by parents who believe in G-d, discussing with their children the possibility that G-d doesn't exist in the traditional form as taught in the major world religions, just move on. You'll want to stop here. Things got complex as we discussed our understanding of G-d as we were raised, and other ideas about how G-d may exist differently. We talked about aspects of Evolution and the Big Bang Theory. We tried to consider how different theories about human beings and other possible life forms could be explained and we agreed about a modern understanding of G-d. We talked about the commonly used phrase, "I'm a G-d-fearing man/woman," and why anyone would fear their G-d. We agreed G-d (no matter your religion or beliefs) wouldn't want people to fear G-d. By the time we reached our destination, my mind was blown. We covered more in the 30-40 minutes than many college philosophy classes cover in a session. And before we got out of the car, I asked both of them, "Do you think other families talk about stuff like this?" My son laughed and said, "No way." We looked at each other and laughed. Then we went and rode go-karts and played mini golf.
All in a day. I love my little quirky family of three.
No comments:
Post a Comment